This is the right attitude. In the coming months, you'll see more things move from More into the Forge (they'll still be official MooTools plugins, btw). We'll "adopt" plugins that we think belong in -more, but we do this rather slower than we used to now that the Forge is there...
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Arian <[email protected]> wrote: > Thats the best thing indeed. I don't think there is a big demand for > it. But if your plugin is so popular in the Forge, useful and well > written, it might be added to Array.Extras in More. (at least not > before 2.0 i guess) > > On 3 jun, 11:37, Barry van Oudtshoorn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Maybe add it to the forge. If you bundled it up with a collection of > > useful Array utilities, it'd make it an even more attractive package. :) > > > > On 3/06/2010 5:26 PM, Robert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, > > > Should I add it as a ticket to the lighthouse? > > > > > It looks like they only accept bugfixes? > > > > > On 2 Cze, 11:07, Robert<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> I believe intersection method would be good extension to the Array > > >> class. There is combine method (set sum) but no set intersection. > > > > >> It could look like this: > > > > >> Array.implement({ > > >> attest: function(item, array) { > > >> if (!array.contains(item)) this.erase(item); > > >> return this; > > >> }, > > >> intersection: function(array) { > > >> for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i< l; i++) > > >> this.attest(this[i], array); > > >> return this; > > >> } > > > > >> }); > > > > >> What You think? > > > > -- > > Not sent from my Apple πPhone >
