Ok, thanks.
On 3 Cze, 15:01, Arian <[email protected]> wrote: > Thats the best thing indeed. I don't think there is a big demand for > it. But if your plugin is so popular in the Forge, useful and well > written, it might be added to Array.Extras in More. (at least not > before 2.0 i guess) > > On 3 jun, 11:37, Barry van Oudtshoorn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Maybe add it to the forge. If you bundled it up with a collection of > > useful Array utilities, it'd make it an even more attractive package. :) > > > On 3/06/2010 5:26 PM, Robert wrote: > > > > Hmm, > > > Should I add it as a ticket to the lighthouse? > > > > It looks like they only accept bugfixes? > > > > On 2 Cze, 11:07, Robert<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I believe intersection method would be good extension to the Array > > >> class. There is combine method (set sum) but no set intersection. > > > >> It could look like this: > > > >> Array.implement({ > > >> attest: function(item, array) { > > >> if (!array.contains(item)) this.erase(item); > > >> return this; > > >> }, > > >> intersection: function(array) { > > >> for (var i = 0, l = this.length; i< l; i++) > > >> this.attest(this[i], array); > > >> return this; > > >> } > > > >> }); > > > >> What You think? > > > -- > > Not sent from my Apple πPhone
