From the 1.3 docs:
var obj1 = {a: 0, b: 1};
var obj2 = {c: 2, d: 3};
var obj3 = {a: 4, d: 5};
var merged = Object.merge(obj1, obj2, obj3); // returns {a: 4, b: 1, c: 2, d:
5}, (obj2, and obj3 are unaltered)
merged === obj1; // true, obj1 gets altered and returned as merged object
var nestedObj1 = {a: {b: 1, c: 1}};
var nestedObj2 = {a: {b: 2}};
var nested = Object.merge(nestedObj1, nestedObj2); // returns: {a: {b: 2, c: 1}}
On Oct 12, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Oskar Krawczyk wrote:
> Ouch.
>
> Yes, this should not happen.
>
> Can you post a ticket on lighthouse?
>
> On 2010-10-12, at 23:32, atom wrote:
>
>> bit of unexpected behavior (which might be intentional). When using
>> Object.merge the objects I pass in are being altered, unlike how
>> $merge used to behave.
>>
>> old way:
>>
>> var obj1 = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
>> var obj2 = {d: 4, e: 5, f: 6}
>> var merged = $merge(obj1, obj2);
>> console.log(obj1); // returns {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
>>
>> new way:
>>
>> var obj1 = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
>> var obj2 = {d: 4, e: 5, f: 6}
>> var merged = Object.merge(obj1, obj2);
>> console.log(obj1); // returns {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6}
>
