We love mootools Arron, thanks for all your hard work and time :) !

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Aaron Newton <anut...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been pretty quiet so far on this thread (except up at the top where
> it got kicked off) so I'll share a few thoughts:
>
>    1. I love that the main drivers of this thread are not core MooTools
>    devs. It goes to the point about you guys (and girls?) taking MooTools to
>    the next level and making things happen. And here you are!
>    2. I'm content to stay out of any of the decision making but I'd like
>    to throw in my 2 cents for Bootstrap. Here's why:
>       1. I use Bootstrap all the time (http://www.thanx.com and the
>       mobile implementation of our app at http://app.thanx.com both use
>       it). Your stuff doesn't need to look anything like Bootstrap to make 
> use of
>       it's goodness.
>       2. It's a robust and mature CSS framework and everyone else is
>       using it. I think it might actually be a GOOD thing to show that 
> MooTools
>       can work just fine w/ Bootstrap.
>       3. The default styles, though a bit boring, are well designed. I
>       can't stress this enough. You have to try and make ugly things with
>       Bootstrap. I can't say that about most other CSS frameworks.
>       4. I have an implementation of most of the Bootstrap features (
>       http://github.com/anutron/mootools-bootstrap). It may need a little
>       bit of updating for the latest version (I don't think so). It does not 
> use
>       the same JS signature; it's not a 1:1 port of how you invoke it (it's 
> more
>       of a MooTools style). Use it or don't, but my point is only that
>       implementing it wasn't that hard.
>       5. Avoiding Bootstrap because they implemented a version of it w/
>       jQuery is a silly reason.
>    3. I'm so happy and proud of this community. Keep it up!
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Tony Brown <tony.brown....@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Excellent!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Tim Wienk <timwi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please do not go too much in-depth with all this yet, at the current
>>> stage I'm confident there won't be a finalised website in two weeks.
>>> We are still just exploring and looking for the right direction and
>>> gathering ideas. Actual implementations (let alone platform or "CMS"
>>> decisions) are not even point of discussion yet.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile a small word of concern regarding the design, as Valerio has
>>> mentioned (see
>>> https://github.com/mootools/website/wiki/MooTools.net-redesign
>>> ), what we're looking for is a rather light design, a lot of
>>> whitespace and clarity. While I think your designs are rather nice in
>>> general, they don't seem to follow that principle as much as the other
>>> mockups in the Wiki do.
>>>
>>> There is some discussion and collaboration regarding the layout
>>> aspects taking place in IRC (#mootools on Freeenode, or
>>> irc://chat.freenode.net:6667/mootools ). You can use your favourite
>>> IRC client, or https://webchat.freenode.net/ if you'd like to join.
>>> Feel free to ping Timmeh or arian (or just ask in general) in that
>>> channel if you'd like a quick update, when someone is around they'll
>>> poke you back, I'm sure. (This goes for everyone, but it'd be
>>> especially nice to see Benjamin there. :-) )
>>>
>>> Furthermore, there hasn't be a lot of activity on the mailing list
>>> regarding the redesign, since we try to collect the different ideas
>>> and remarks in the Github wiki, feel free to add your own ideas as
>>> well: https://github.com/mootools/website/wiki/_pages . I'm really
>>> impressed with the level of the designs and designers we're seeing,
>>> the final outcome will surely be a combination of multiple people's
>>> designs (in fact, most of the current mockups in the Wiki are already
>>> results of combined ideas).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Wienk, Software Developer, MooTools Developer
>>> E. timwi...@gmail.com | W. http://tim.wienk.name
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "MooTools Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mootools-users/fz2dbZE-iOk/unsubscribe?hl=en
>>> .
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Sincerely,*
>>
>> Tony Brown
>>
>> twitter:   https://twitter.com/pixelBender67
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "MooTools Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "MooTools Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mootools-users/fz2dbZE-iOk/unsubscribe?hl=en
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
*Sincerely,*

Tony Brown

twitter:   https://twitter.com/pixelBender67

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MooTools Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mootools-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to