|
Hi Mindy,
I have linenbacked some double sided posters, but that was
because the customer decided on that. My feeling is that the only reason to
linenback a poster is that the poster itself has damage that you can't live
with. Spending the money to linenback a current double sided poster doesn't seem
monetarily sound since you could probably go out and buy the same poster in
excellent condition for less than linenbacking would cost you. The optimum way
to collect and preserve is without linenbacking. If linenbacking is done, as
with older vintage posters, it can sometimes add to the value of the poster
because it makes the poster "look" better. However, this is a debate in our
hobby that has yet to be settled. Some people like to linenback and some never
linenback. I guess since there are buyers for both situations, to this point, it
hasn't created a major problem.
I frame double sided posters on a daily basis and most
of my studio accounts drymount them before framing, because they don't
really care about collectability. If for some reason one of those doublesided
posters became worth a fortune in years to come, the poster could be "unmounted"
and then it would have to be linenbacked because the back side of the poster
would have glue residue on it. But to me, there would have to be a good reason
to spend the money to linenback a double sided poster today.
Sue Heim
(800) 463-2994
|
- Re: [MOPO] Susan Heim
- Re: [MOPO] Ed Flood
- Re: [MOPO] Susan Heim
- Re: [MOPO] Tom Martin
- [MOPO] Sharon Herndon
- [MOPO] Joan Copple
- [MOPO] Joan Copple
- [MOPO] Michael B
- Re: [MOPO] I'M ALIVE, I'M ALIVE.... Phil Edwards Cinema Arts
- Re: [MOPO] I'M ALIVE, I'M ALIVE.... Michael B
- Re: [MOPO] I'M ALIVE, I'M ALIVE.... Freedom Lover

