When eBay changed the rules and made it that sellers couldn't leave
feedback, I predicted that some number of buyers would take advantage of
this and "blackmail" sellers into free items or discounts, using the thread
of negatives as a club.

That was one of the reasons I decided to leave forever, and why no longer
sell there.

Before I could "get out of Dodge" completely, so wacko Italian buyer ordered
10 cheap items for around $100 total, and he asked for them to be sent via
uninsured Airmail. I e-mailed him that if they somehow were lost it would be
HE who was responsible for the loss, and that if he wanted ME to be
responsible, he would have to send them insured.

He replied back that he wanted uninsured, and I sent the items, and a month
later, he put in a PayPal claim saying the items never arrived, and he also
left 10 negatives on eBay (without contacting me in any way).

I disputed the PayPal claim, showing the items were sent, and showing the
e-mails where he requested uninsured and accepted responsibility.

Of course, PayPal ruled against me and seized the money from my account and
refunded him, and of course the 10 negatives still stand.

Now these awful eBay and PayPal rules give terrible buyers like these
complete power over sellers, and for what purpose? Look at this guy's
feedback:
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=almightyblue&ftab=AllFeedback

Even with all this great "protection" eBay now has, this guy hardly ever
buys anything and has quit buying for months. So *WHO* do these awful rule
changes benefit, and is this not a major reason in why eBay continues to
circle the drain?

Bruce

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to