I guess I am not a Big Name Expert (and I guess I am glad I am not) but I
did issue a single "tut". I want that "on the record". I don't argue with
Peter.

Bruce

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:22 PM, James Richard
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  The other day Peter send us this example of the tracking number he got
> using stamps.com to pay (paying only $1.95 for their "eSignature
> Confirmation service). All the Big Name Experts tut-tutted and told him it
> was not a "real tracking number" like the big boys use. So, I took the
> number and plugged it into USPS. I noticed there was a link I could click
> which would cause the Post Office to send email notices of the packages
> progress. I submitted my address to that link. Here's what I received from
> the Post Office today for that number -- Hmmm...it looks pretty much like
> what one expect to get from a "real tracking number" to me:
>
>  Track & Confirm e-mail update information provided by the U.S. Postal 
> Service.
>
> Label Number: 2101 0521 2977 6987 4009
>
> Service Type: Priority Mail Signature Confirmation
>
> Shipment Activity        Location                               Date & Time
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sorting Complete         MINNEAPOLIS MN 55408                   02/10/10  
> 8:10am
>
> Arrival at Unit          MINNEAPOLIS MN 55408                   02/10/10  
> 6:20am
>
> Electronic Shipping      GIBSONVILLE NC 27249                   02/08/10  
> 9:23pm
> Info Received
>
>
> Reminder: Track & Confirm by email
>
> Date of email request:  02/09/10
>
> Future activity will continue to be emailed for up to 2 weeks from the Date of
> Request shown above. If you need to initiate the Track & Confirm by email
> process again at the end of the 2 weeks, please do so at the USPS Track &
> Confirm web site at http://www.usps.com/shipping/trackandconfirm.htm
>
>
>
> peter contarino wrote:
>
>  Sean-here is an actual shipment from my dashboard:
>
> * *
>
> *Postage Transaction Record*
>
> Tuesday, February 09, 2010
>
>
>
> Device ID:       xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Print Date:      February 08, 2010 - 01:36:01 PM
>
> Mail Date:       February 08, 2010
>
> User:               pcontarino
>
> Customer ID:  xxxxxxxx
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Return             Peter Contarino
>
> Address:         Majestic Posters
>
>
>
>
>
> Delivery          XXXX XXXX
>
> Address:         XXXX XXXXX
>
>                         minneapolis MN 55409-1117
>
>
>
> *Tracking #:    9121010521297769874009*
>
>
>
> Weight:           0 lbs 10 oz
>
>
>
> Refund Type: e/Refund
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> *Cost:*              Postage
>
>
>
> Mail Class
>
>                                     Priority
> Mail®:                                                           $5.05
>
>
>
> Special Services
>
>                                     e/Signature
> Confirmation:                                       $1.95
>
>
>
> I get tracking info no matter what method I ship(priority, first class,
> express, etc). That said, I don’t have a lot of faith in the actual tracking
> capability of the USPS.
>
>
>
> -peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________ How to
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to:
> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>
>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to