I might also mention that parts of the film are totally unintelligible and some very important issues are completely glossed over, like for instance why Nina Van Pallandt kills the woman and what the historical connection is between the victim and Sterling Hayden (who in my opinion is the single actor in the film that did a good job) that resulted in the crime. Why Terry Lennox is involved at all is almost completely ignored and to say that Jim Bouton was 100 times the ball player than he was an actor is an understatement of massive proportion

At 12:49 PM 8/26/2012, Posteritati wrote:
rich,

beg to differ but altman's deconstruction of marlowe is simply
brilliant and considered so by many influential film critics. in my
opinion book adaptations should not necessarily heed closely to the
original.

fyi,i am also a big marlowe fan and have read & loved his books.

regards,
sam

Posteritati
239 Centre Street
New York, NY  10013
212-226-2207/ Fax: 212-226-2102
http://www.posteritati.com/




On Aug 26, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:

quick answer. Released with the original Amsel style A& B.
film did poorly (because as a Raymond Chandler adaptation, the film
sucks. more below)
film was pulled & a new comedic ad campaign was designed with MAD
artist Jack Davis.
the film apparently didn't last a couple weeks in it's first release
and it didn't get wide release either, so distribution of posters
was minimal.
it is interesting to note I have never been able to find a Pressbook
with the original posters and Walt Reuben says there isn't one,
although the pressbook for the re-issued campaign is very common.
The international design is not in the pressbook.
It is also interesting to note that all four styles do exist as 1sh,
insert, hs & possibly 30x40. I have never seen 3sheets for the Amsel
designs, although I do have the Davis & not too long ago got the
International from Bruce's auctions. It is unusual for a film of
this time period to have 4 different posters in those sizes mentioned.


why Long Goodbye SUCKS

this is really something that gets down to the basic content of the
book and how Altman decided to translate it.

#1 all Marlowe books are "first-person" stories. All scenes written
contain Marlowe and what is described is what he sees.

#2 Altman's movie making philosophy is diametrically opposed to such
a structure. Altman's films are ensemble pieces where each character
is equally as important as all others and even the starring actors
are secondary concepts. Any single character standing out is
anathema to Altman's style

#3 Altman literally destroyed the Marlowe myth as a White Knight. He
changed Marlowe from an intelligent chess player, college grad
(Marlowe broke his nose as a football player in college), a former
investigator in the District Attorney's office and the anti-
misogynist into a bumbling detective who couldn't find his own shoes
under his bed and then finally at the end of the film, a murderer
who happily dances down the road after killing Terry Lennox in cold
blood.

the film should have been made as a standard vehicle without any
attribution to Chandler. As a Marlowe movie, it's even worse than
the Brasher Doubloon which also partially destroyed the Marlowe
myth, but wasn't as pretentious as Altman's interpretation of
Chandler's work.

       Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
 ___________________________________________________________________
            How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                     The author of this message is
solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to