Hi, all, from Joe B in NOLA-- on a wet, cold but still partying Mardi Gras Day 
(I'm working!) I wasn't going to comment on the Sunday Night Follies but I 
guess I'll get over it and do so:
 
I can only sum up my depressing disappointment in "Oscar" in the 21st Century 
(in general) and Sunday's debacle (in particular) by noting that it was 
inevitable from the announcement of the choice of "host."  The talented and 
generous  Ellen is simply the WRONG person for the job--  the worst host 
(barring Letterman!) in Oscar history--- 
 
And "Oscar" obviously wants to put on a new costume--- the flashy rags of the 
21st-Century Silly-Yuppie --  rather than the one it wore most of the time--- 
that of the premiere Arts organization it was supposed to be.
Though he wasn't the nicest of guys, I salute Louis B. Mayer for founding the 
Academy, even if he did so to stack the decks for MGM rather than to truly 
honor anyone or anything but himself.  
But Oscar was most always about Excellence in previous days.   Mayer and 
Company would have run Ellen and Company, pizzas and twitterers in hand-- out 
of town--- far, FAR past the Hollywood Sign!! 
 
It's time for the Academy of Motion Pictures, Arts & Sciences to live up to its 
name again.  It can start by televising the late fall awards show for the 
techies and "old folks" (like Angela Lansbury and Liza Minnelli and Lauren 
Bacall and ME!);  on Internet or Satellite, of course, not the regular 
networks, for they are reserved for The Masses!!  
In future years, let's leave the "Big Show" to the 40-yr-old kiddies with their 
explosions and comic book fare.  It'll be on right after The Game!!!!!  
 
Joe B in NOLA
 
PS-- Congrats, though, to the winners!!!  Most deserving!  Everyone!!!   In 
particular, Jared and Michael!! Right on, guys!



On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 2:05 PM, Kirby McDaniel <[email protected]> 
wrote:
  
Those clips could not have been longer than two minutes if that.  It would be 
interesting to know whether The Academy has those
clips archived.  I still remember the one from BEN HUR.

Am I wrong — or did they have those clips for the Best Actor / Best Actress 
awards too?

K.


On Mar 4, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Kirby's comment actually highlights one of the differences between
today's film editing techniques and the old techniques:
>
>today's films - particularly those by Zach Snyder for instance - are
overloaded with staccato 15 frame edits to force visual action. You
hardly see what the camera setup was.
>
>This would be unlike the long orations of a few seconds or longer, or the
focus on a star's face for many seconds
>
>of course, add the staccato edits to low lighting techniques used
commonly today and you always have a feeling you missed lots of
imagery
>
>it makes sense that the current audience is more interested in these fast
clips than a 3.5 minute Kubrick take as in Paths of Glory or the one by
Welles at the beginning of Touch of Evil
>
>is it progress? that's for the historians to pronouce down the
road
>
>Rich
>
>At 11:40 AM 3/4/2014, Kirby McDaniel wrote:
>
>I have one comment.  I
think that the Best Picture clips were better when they used to be short
scenes from the films rather than these mash-ups that they do now. 
>>
>>Other than that I can’t really comment much about them because I missed
them for the FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE!  I attended a concert by The
Cleveland Orchestra on Sunday
>>night.  Since the orchestra was utterly FABULOUS, I don’t feel
bereft of anything.  I did see the last few awards.  The
nominees were all in pretty good company this year.  Some
>>outstanding pictures.  You people in Cleveland are lucky to have
that wonderful orchestra.  They played a great program at the
Menuhin Festival here, including the Tchaikovsky
>>5th Symphony which was a tour de force.  An orchestra of that
dimension ----- is the highest - fi there is.
>>
>>
>>
>>Kirby
>>
>>On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Channing Thomson
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>What's Alf?  On a more
serious note, I felt the reaction to Kim Novak was painful and cruel and
left me feeling down for a couple of days.  I didn't like the
overall tone of the Awards this year.  I'd like to see a little more
focus on film history and the people that made the industry great as well
as a return to it being presented as an Academy and not a celebrity
roast.  Channing Thomson
>>>
>>>On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Scott Burns
<[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>There was a time when the
Academy celebrated the magic of the movies, both past AND present. That’s
clearly not the case these days. The only “salute” to Hollywood’s past
was the Oz tribute—but they didn’t think enough of Garland’s offspring to
even bring them up on stage. Couldn’t the last surviving Munchkin, Jerry
Maren make an appearance? Nothing against Pink, but what relevance to Oz
did she have? Major missed opportunity Academy!
>>>> 
>>>>It seemed to me that no one in the audience even recognized Kim Novak
(please no plastic surgery jokes). No standing ovation for this star of
the 50’s/60’s? There’s no excuse for anyone in the movie biz not having
ever seen “Vertigo” or “Picnic.”
>>>> 
>>>>And no tribute to Shirley Temple? Come on. Even those members of “new
Hollywood” must have watched a few Temple films when they were growing
up. Of course my beef about classic stars goes beyond the Oscars.
Entertainment Weekly puts Phillip Seymour Hoffman on the cover when he
kills himself via a drug overdose, yet arguably the biggest star of the
1930’s gets no mention on the cover at all? She did get 2 pages inside,
but I was surprised they gave her even that much space.
>>>> 
>>>>Even when I was in my 20’s and watching the Oscars, I always enjoyed
seeing the classic stars who had dropped out of the limelight. I enjoyed
the honorary Oscar presentation and even the Jean Hersholt award …now
such honors have been moved off the Oscar telecast completely.
>>>> 
>>>>Not to diss the younger generation, but the world did exist before you
were born and there are people and events worth knowing about. I work
with some people who’s pop culture knowledge only reaches back as far as
the “Alf” TV show in the 1990’s. Scary!!! 
>>>> 
>>>>Scott
>>>>MoPo List Owner
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>From: MoPo List
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zeev
Drach
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 9:47 AM
>>>>To: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Oscars - a slave to sentiment?
>>>> 
>>>>My instinctive reaction re modern “stars” is the same as yours, but after
thinking a moment you realize that for a good chunk of viewers, if not
the majority, Robert  De Niro IS an old-time star!  Anybody
prior is a vaguely familiar.  All this means is that some of us,
like you yourself suggested, are getting really old!
>>>> 
>>>>Zeev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>From: MoPo List
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce
Hershenson
>>>>Sent: March 4, 2014 8:14 AM
>>>>To: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Oscars - a slave to sentiment?
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>One thing I am certain of is that if you are a fan of the
"Ellen" TV show, then you surely liked the Oscar telecast. And
if you like watching people pat themselves and their peers on the back,
you were surely in hog heaven.
>>>>
>>>>I know I am getting really old, because I think the modern
"stars" can't hold a candle to the stars of the 1920s to
1960s.
>>>>I always hated those "production numbers". I would SO rather
see old-time stars, and not just given a second and then shuffled off
stage.  How about clips of classic movies that DON'T last three
seconds each?
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Tommy Barr
<[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>>I know it’s not really about posters, but I haven’t read anything here
about the Oscars, so I wondered if any others share my puzzlement over
exactly what the criteria for ‘best film’ is?  Apart from the big
one 12 Years A Slave  won 2 other Oscars, while Gravity won
7 awards, including best director. Surely that must be a win on points
for Gravity? Ellen joked that either 12 Years would win or
else the Academy was racist, and I suspect that the Afro-American
dimension did, in fact, contribute to the end decision. Racism does not
necessarily have to express itself as hatred, but it is not particularly
edifying to see it expressed in a patronising way either. I was saddened
to see the great actor Sidney Poitier trundled out to receive what was,
given the occasion, something like a pat on the head for his career and
being the first black actor to win an Oscar for Best Actor, and am I
being in overly critical in the Academy then having Will Smith present
the Best Film award? There is no doubt that Hollywood, like the rest of
the USA, can have its conscience tugged when it comes to the treatment of
the Afro-American community. Birth of a Nation is hardly an advert
for multi-cultural harmony, and movies like the Marx Brothers A Day At
The Races have scenes which sit uncomfortably with present day
attitudes. Maybe the Academy felt some atonement was due for the failure
of  The Color Purple to win any awards? Anyway, as a
non-American I may have a jaundiced view which is not shared by others,
but I am interested in finding out what the views of MOPO subscribers
are.
>>>> 
>>>>Tommy
>>>>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>Send a message addressed to: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>The author of this message is solely responsible for its
content.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>Bruce Hershenson and the other 29 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
>>>>P.O. Box 874
>>>>West Plains, MO 65775
>>>>Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we
take lunch)
>>>>our site
>>>>our
auctions
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>Complete Buyer Protection - No time limit on our guarantees & NO buyer 
>>>>beware
>>>>Hershenson Help Hotline - Direct line to Bruce (our owner!) for
urgent problems
>>>>Also, please read the following three pages of in-depthCustomer
Reviews of our company - Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, which shows you in our 
customers' own words exactly what
makes our company and our auctions so very different from all
others!
>>>> 
>>>>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>Send a message addressed to: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>The author of this message is solely responsible for its
content.
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
>>>>protection is
active.
>>>> 
>>>>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>Send a message addressed to: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>>>>
>>>>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>>>>___________________________________________________________________
>>>>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>Send a message addressed to: mailto:[email protected]
>>>>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>The author of this message is solely responsible for its
content. 
>
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message addressed to: mailto:[email protected]
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
>
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at http://www.filmfan.com/
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
___________________________________________________________________ 
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List  
Send a message addressed to: [email protected] 
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L  
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to