I agree with Rich entirely here.  We all resent rising prices, but Heritage is 
just one of millions of business experiecing rising costs.

Kirby McDaniel
www.movieart.com <http://www.movieart.com/>


> On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I largely agree with Ira and disagree with Simon in some ways
> 
> for the most part, I win very little under $100, and so the $19 min bp means 
> nothing as I'm already paying 19.5%
> 
> if you only bid in the signature auctions, then the $19 min has no effect as 
> nothing sells under $100 in those, so you're only talking about Sunday 
> auctions and in case people don't pay attention, the average item price in an 
> HA sale is $70-100 on a weekly basis (last week they did just short of $41k 
> on 496 listings est $82 per item, with bp).
> 
> it has at best, a small effect
> 
> what about those sellers who drive down prices by selling massive amount of 
> posters for $20 and less, including silent & golden age material that 
> previously sold for much higher prices? Aren't they a negative worth 
> discussing? Don't they have a greater effect on collectors, devaluing their 
> collections in real time? 
> 
> Nobody forces anyone to do business with any specific entity. You can choose 
> who you spend money with, just like I do. (this is part of the 
> capiltalist/consumerist theory)
> If HA has something you want this week, I seriously doubt the extra $5 has 
> much of a curtailing aspect to it
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> At 08:29 AM 6/16/2016, Ira Rubenstein wrote:
>> I guess I come at this from a collector view.   And I have never sold 
>> anything that I have bought before.   So I am probably a little naïve about 
>> it all.    And if I was selling a lot of items, then of course I would want 
>> a maximum of options to sell through.    
>> 
>> To me the relationship between auction houses and dealers is symbiotic.  
>> They both need each other.    Dealers bid on auction items all the time in 
>> an effort to find something to resell.   This helps maintain a floor on 
>> pricing. I am sure dealers sell through auctions at times well when they 
>> need to liquidate or manage inventory.      And I don’t think this is 
>> exclusive to Movie Posters.   (Books, Coins, Stamps, Baseball cards, Art, 
>> etc…>> )    All areas of collections have dealers and auction houses.     
>> 
>> From a collectors stand point I have relationships with many dealers both in 
>> Movie Posters and Animation art.   One animation art dealer has done an 
>> exceptional job of always calling me when he finds something he knows I will 
>> be interested in.    Many others don’t.     But as a collector it is also 
>> fun to participate in Auctions because there is always one item you are 
>> looking for.  Comes up from time to time.  You lose out a few times and then 
>> you win.   And the fun is to finally win.   And at a price you can afford.   
>> Or you realize you have to save more to get what you want.     OR you see a 
>> poster you have never seen before and you decide it looks amazing and you 
>> want to hang it on your wall.   That’s the fun of discovery.   
>> 
>> So to me,  having healthy auction houses and healthy dealers is best for 
>> everyone.   I don’t think one can survive without the other.   And I don’t 
>> think it is a win/lose situation.     
>> 
>> I can’t speak to people leaving the hobby or staying in it.   I would think 
>> a lot of it is age of the typical collecting consumer and what type of films 
>> they grew up with.    I am amazed at what 80’s film posters are selling for 
>> when I know there are tens of thousands of copies of each one.    (Having 
>> worked in the film marketing world)      To me,  these are the films of 
>> their youth and that’s what they want to hang on their wall.    It can also 
>> be that as people get older they look at getting rid of things,  smaller 
>> homes,   wanting the money to do other things as they live in retirement.    
>> 
>>  I can also see for myself in the next 10 to 15 years as I downsize,  I will 
>> probably be forced to look hard at starting to sell my collection.    And 
>> figuring out the best way to do that.  Who knows,  it may be my retirement 
>> career,   joining all of you in the dealer world.  :)     
>> 
>> Personally, as a collector/consumer I do like Heritage and I like Bruce at 
>> emovieposter.     The auctions are well run.   Accurate descriptions.  
>> Pictures.  Billing and packing are easy.  A lot done digitally.   Heritage 
>> Live on a mobile platform is very impressive tech.      In my area of work,  
>> I am always reminding people to focus on the consumer and both of them have 
>> done that.   Very well.    And if you focus on the consumer first,  you will 
>> always win.    (Steve Jobs lesson)  
>> 
>> Thank you all for your thoughts.  I enjoy these type of discussions as I 
>> learn more about the hobby and the business of posters.    
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Ira
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    
>> 
>> From: MoPo List < [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Simon Oram < 
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Reply-To: Simon Oram < [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:41 AM
>> To: " [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" < 
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges
>> 
>> Yes I think Wim pointed out by what you wrote Ira..”dominant” by definition 
>> that means, control or power over others and when that happens a market 
>> becomes stale and unexciting, the business of collecting and dealing did 
>> seem all more exciting a few years back. 
>>  
>> It also seems to me that allot of people who had taken up collecting around 
>> the millennium mark are, dropping like flies out of the market place, 
>> selling up and moving on from it. I can only write what I have been told 
>> but, I have been asking. Heritage promises the world to it’s consignors and 
>> they expect to get it, it’s a possibility that people only trust them with 
>> it.
>>  
>> Simon 
>> From: Wim Jansen <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:09 PM
>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges
>>  
>>> I would say as a animation collector too,  I was very impressed with their 
>>> recent animation auction.   They have quickly become the dominant auction 
>>> house for animation art.  
>>  
>> There’s your answer, coming into the market, flooding it with volume and 
>> eliminate the original expert dealers without needing the expertise. Then 
>> after that you raise your percentages. 
>> I have bought quite a few posters with Heritage and i do trust and value 
>> Grey as a straight business guy and a very knowledgable expert, but I always 
>> have niggles in the deal after the purchase. In those events I have had 
>> contact with a lot of people. It seems like the entire back office consists 
>> of temps, there’s a huge turnover of personnel. That does not feel good.
>>  
>> Wim
>> Op 16 jun. 2016, om 15:27 heeft Ira Rubenstein <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> I think you will see that through this move,   Heritage will eliminate 
>>> people listing lower priced items.     As a business if they can focus on 
>>> higher ticket items there is a higher return per item.    There is a fixed 
>>> labor cost per item you list,  and as a business obviously you want to 
>>> maximize your return per item.          
>>>  
>>> I am not saying the increase on a min charge is right or wrong.  To me it 
>>> is just a business decision.      I would say as a animation collector too, 
>>>  I was very impressed with their recent animation auction.   They have 
>>> quickly become the dominant auction house for animation art.   
>>>  
>>> I am curious to the last statement about how the Film Poster Business has 
>>> lost a lot because of Heritage and their patrons.     I am a collector and 
>>> not a dealer.    How has Heritage hurt the business?   Is that a overall 
>>> Dealer perspective?   
>>>  
>>> I would also agree with the other statement that there are lots of other 
>>> venues and in a free trade society,  if something gets out of whack, there 
>>> will always be something new to balance it.   
>>>  
>>> Anyway,  my .02.   
>>>  
>>> Ira
>>> From: MoPo List < [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Simon Oram < 
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Reply-To: " [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" < 
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:41 AM
>>> To: " [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" < 
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges
>>>  
>>> Agree..I think it was good to start with now, it seems the film poster 
>>> business has lost allot because of them? and their patrons.
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>>> From: Michael Greenwood
>>> Sent: Thursday, 16 June 2016 12:23
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Reply To: Michael Greenwood
>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Heritage charges
>>>  
>>> I'm sure they justified it to their shareholders in the normal way...growth 
>>> must come at a cost...to the users.  And I imagine they were pleased with 
>>> this news.  The non-stop greed in this world is really intense these days!  
>>> Thankfully this hobby has other venues and less grabby sellers.
>>>  
>>> M
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: MoPo List < [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Tommy Barr 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:21 AM
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [MOPO] Heritage charges 
>>>  
>>> Just noticed that from this weekend Heritage Auctions is charging a minimum 
>>> buyer's commission of $19, an increase of 36%. I just wonder how they 
>>> justify that? 
>>>  
>>> Tommy
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
>> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1>
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 
> <https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to