I'm guessing those words are your starting attempt HZ ? Two initial observations ...
To me, Politics is the pragmatic application of policy. So yes, it's a social activity, but there is no reason why the policies themselves should not be based on intellectual activity. So, I find your focus on maintaining or creating merely static patterns unnecessarily limiting. No reason why policy should not enable, encourage, facilitate dynamic quality too. Of course the history of partisan politics has tended to preserve ideological patterns, but history is only a guide to the future, not some hard prediction or constraint ? Ian On 8/13/07, Hamza Zeytinoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If anybody is interested, I would like to get your ideas on an attempt to > re-define politics (in MOQ terms); > > "Politics is social activity with the goal to enable or to prevent the > movement of static value from one group to another (creating change or > maintaining no change)." > > Best regards > HZ > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.15/949 - Release Date: 12/08/2007 > 11:03 > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
