DMB says to Ham -- > So let me get this straight. Pirsig is a rationalizing, drunken, > condescending, moralizer? Is that really what you think or are you > just expressing frustration at your own inability to comprehend the > MOQ? Given the overly emotional tone, the ridiculous straw man you > portray and the lack of any coherent thoughts behind your insults, I'd
> bet big bucks on the latter. Ham: I was simply using an analogy to express what passes for philosophy these days. Since analogies are a form of poetic license freely used by your esteemed author, it seemed an appropriate way to summarize my take on Platt's analysis of the MoQ. My statement was obviously intended as criticism of a thesis, not a personal "insult". Ron: to this topic I offer this link on philosophy and poetry http://www.nietzschecircle.com/essayArchive8.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
