Ham Priday said:
What I see as Pirsig's "rationale" is to re-arrange the attributes of existence to invent a new perspective. Like the cartographer who, feeling a bit tipsy one day, looks at a relief map of the world and decides to draw his own boundaries, Pirsig looks at common experience and divides it up in an uncommon way, making Quality the "moral superpower" and classifying subjective and objective elements as its subordinate levels. Having redefined everything to suit his moralistic rationale, he sits back and says, "See--this is what reality really is. Isn't morality wonderful?" How stupid of us ignoramuses not to see that we were looking at morality all the time! That's poetic license for a writer, of couse. But PHILOSOPHY??

dmb says:
So let me get this straight. Pirsig is a rationalizing, drunken, condescending, moralizer? Is that really what you think or are you just expressing frustration at your own inability to comprehend the MOQ? Given the overly emotional tone, the ridiculous straw man you portray and the lack of any coherent thoughts behind your insults, I'd bet big bucks on the latter.

As I like to say from time to time, reading the works under discussion is the only requirement for participation here. You obviously have not done that. Or if you have read the books, your level of comprehension must be somewhere near 0%. I mean, genuine criticism is perfectly cool, but you first have to know what it is you're talking about. Otherwise, those who have read Pirsig are never going to take you seriously. Not even Platt, that's how bad it is!

Thanks,
dmb

_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to