[Micah]
> the past, a human mental concept, only exists in our perception of now.
I don't see the past as a "human mental concept". The concept of the past
might be a human mental concept, but not the past itself. Nor do I see the
past as existing. Whatever existed in the past might not exist now.
[Micah]
> Your premise is; that time exists independent of man - could you please show
> how you know this?
I don't see this as one of my premises. Some aspects of time might be
independent of man ("Time and tide wait for no man"); some aspects might not
be. We know in what way time is independent of man in the same way we know in
what way it isn't.
[Micah]
> Who could have put time there (other than us)?
I don't think time has been put anywhere by anybody.
[Micah]
> What is time?
Time is what is measured by clocks. But this isn't a definition or analysis of
"time". Possibly time cannot be analyzed as something simpler (i.e., possibly
"time" cannot be defined.)
Craig
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
