Ron,
>I find it interesting how you can jump in start a pissing contest yet
>you're no where to be found in regard to the subject of the thread,
Sorry for the confusion caused by my reply to Platt's recent
"subject/object logic" post but he was making a number of misleading
assertions there that largely referred to issues we were discussing in
the thread titled "Pirsig's
idea of the individual".
Regarding the issue of "pre-intellectual experience", subjects and
objects, and the MOQ, you might find the following exchange (I found
while digging-up that tetralemma thread for SA) between Paul Turner and
Scott Roberts useful.
Best wishes,
Anthony
Anthony,
Thank you for clearing that up, I have to admit I was at first alittle
puzzled by Platts response
then taken aback by the venom of yours. I had no idea what was going on.
Thank you very much for the Turner/Roberts exchange it is much
appreciated.
Your Matrix analogy is well noted, This is what I see as the difficulty
in applying MOQ
to scientific inquiry, MOQ really does not recognize its structure, it's
kinda like
trying to mesh a clock work system with hydraulics.
I will read over the exchange and comment if you are interested in
helping me
grapple with these concepts, or, better still if this trail has been
blazed before
a point in the right direction in the archives would be helpful also
(then I would'nt be rehashing the same stuff for you).
Many Thanks
-Ron
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
