[Ian]
> > I think we've been round that loop in this very
> thread (or a parallel
> > recent thread) ? Ian
[Bo]
> We certainly have been and certainly will be again.
> Intellect's role
> in the MOQ is its sore spot. Look to my response to
> David M.
> about (his) examples of alleged non-S/O intellectual
> patterns - an
> oxymoron IMO.
Another comment, a discussion will go nowhere,
for Bo. To again blanket that the "Intellect's role
in the MOQ is its sore spot" is this stuckness you
dictate. Intellect is more dynamic than this absolute
definition of SOM, but I understand you don't think
that way. That's fine. Just pointing out my
intellect's role is not "sore". Sometimes it might
be, but I'd say no-mind helps to rid the double-edged
sword of S/O, but anyways...
woods,
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
