> > [Marsha Previously]
> >. .... .. ... .....,
> >. ....., .... ....., .... ....., . ......,
> >... ....
[SA previously]
> > Hey Marsha, this is the kind of picture I see
> >when I write. Painting is much more immediate at
> >times.
[Marsha]
> And not immediate enough at others.
Maybe art, any art, as you mention at times,
becomes too static, too intellectual from one time to
another. But too static might be less dynamic, yet
still not stuck. Too static would be another way to
say a static pattern. Sure these words are tip-toeing
around and what I'm saying can be put another way. I
give it try. What I'm saying is direct experience of
any art will flow, be dynamic and then become static
to our current direct experience. When I write, and
rewrite, then type it on the computer to redraft it
again, to further clarify, and reclarify, what becomes
dynamic is that first rough draft, but I still don't
want to lose understanding so others might be able to
know what I'm saying. That doesn't have to be the
only goal. Private works can mean much for me, and
nothing to other people. "So what's this have to do
with immediate experience?" I ask myself. I guess it
depends on what stage in the process I'm in.
thanks.
night,
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
