> At 09:11 AM 11/19/2007, you wrote:
> >Quoting MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > At 08:18 AM 11/19/2007, Platt wrote:
> > > >Recent books touting atheism
> > > >and the entire secular progressive movement is the modern day
> > > >version of intellect
> > > >attempting to dominate social patterns.
> > >
> > > Hi Platt,
> > >
> > > Couldn't atheism and secularism be a reflection of what some people
> > > think is intellectually good?
> >
> >Hi Marsha,
> >
> >Sure. The question is: "What is the role of intellect in determining
> >what is good?" My answer: "None."
> >
> >Platt
[Marsha]
> Platt, are you suggesting that the intellect has no value, quality, good?
{Platt]
No, not at all. I'm suggesting intellect can't determine what is good.
[Marsha}
> Besides to use the word "dominate" in your original sentence was a
> bit of an exaggeration. Don't you think?
[Platt]
No. Freedom of speech, of the press, trial by jury, etc. are examples of
intellectual patterns dominating social patterns of conformity.
Platt
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
