In a message dated 11/30/2007 6:46:12 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You really can't compare the two. Each will have to stand on its own in the eye of the beholder Khaled Which is my point. So Quality is, in fact, "just what you like?" >This is ZAMM and fairly early while the Quality debate was a >game Pirsig played with his teacher colleagues. Later - in LILA >after the Reality=Quality postulate - such demonstrations became >superfluous and useless. If quality is removed there is no >existence at all, full stop!. Well, you could use the same logic to "prove" that God exists. If you remove God (and all of his actions) from the world, there is no world. > If it produces a >more coherent world than SOM it's proven fact (and THAT is >does) Do you happen to have the page numbers? Sorry, I haven't read Lila in ages. **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
