'Agents' of course would be evaluating patterns of value.
Marsha At 06:35 AM 12/1/2007, you wrote: >At 02:04 AM 12/1/2007, you wrote: > >At 04:16 PM 11/30/2007, you wrote: > > >To clarify my point: if we like certain things more because we recognize > > >more Quality in them, i.e., because our experiences help us > relate to these > > >objects, then why do art connoisseurs differentiate between what's > > >"good" and > > >what they "like?" > > > >Since I'm avoiding the unknown in painting, I thought it would be > >valuable to play with your question. > > > >If we value certain values more because we value more value in them, > >i.e., because our values help us relate to these values, then why do > >people who evaluate art value between what's "value" and what they "value?" > > > >Have I paraphrased your question correctly? > > > >Marsha > >Greetings redsky in the morning, > >I really feel compelled to tighten further my paraphrase of your question: >--- >If we value certain values more because we value more value in them, >i.e., because our values help us value these values, then why do >people who evaluate art value between what's "value" and what they "value?" >--- > >I bet I could tighten further by transforming the word 'people' and >the pronouns into 'valuing agents'. I might also ask why you asked >the question? What is there other than value? > >Marsha > > > > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
