Ham:To the extent that Pirsig seems to define existence as the product of > experience, change is illusory. On the other hand, to the extent that he > insists on dealing with existence as evolutionary process, change is > essential. What neither Parmenides nor Pirsig has taken into account is > that existence is only what "appears to be" in time and space, whereas > ultimate reality is the undifferentiated source of experience. Since the > mode of experiential reality is relative to time and space, it cannot be > Absolute Realty. Once we understand this--Voila!--there is no paradox. >
DM: I think we can suggest that experience is absolute and is both undiffereniable and equally differentiable. And volia we do not need to imagine a reality without experience because that would be a very odd thing to imagine don't you think! Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
