[Marsha]
> I was pointing out that it might be better to try to
> have experience-based discussions to try to subvert
our
> language's inherent dualistic, s/o
> characteristics.
I do this often here, don't you think. I discuss
my experience at work, and at times my experience in
the woods. This is why I end posts with woods, night,
cold, windy, etc... for these are components of the
event I'm experiencing. I try to bring up experiences
as a way to point a non-isolated experience upon any
particular level for the experiences incorporate each
level. I'm trying to pull the discussion to wake up
'out of intellect', 'out of social', 'out of...etc...'
lines of thinking where dynamic quality is, yes, made
static, but these are all experiences and s/o or any
other static pattern is pointing out the experience.
I do this almost on every thread at times, but the
discussion will get bogged down into the intellectual,
trapped, and the experience begins to dry up. Sure
intellect experiences directly with dq, but dq is not
secluded to this level. This is also why I kept
bringing up 'a picture is worth a thousand words', for
experience is worth a million-million, etc... words.
Nobody could write enough.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
