Hi Steve

26 Dec. you  wrote:

> Bo agreed:
> > Agree, this is the way most people of this discussion regards the
> > intellectual level. For me it is the ability to distinguish between 
> > what's subjective and what's objective .. which BTW is how my
> > dictionary defines "intellect".
 
> Steve:
> I can't find a dictionary that says anything like that. Can you 
> provide a direct quote? Pirsig does want to use regular dictionary
> definitions for terms, so  If you can provide such a quote it would be
> helpful to your cause.

Steve you are an "oldie" around this place and must remember 
my countless references to the "Oxford Advanced" (Eighteenth 
impression 1985) ISBN 0 194311066 6) that says:

    "Power of the mind to reason, contrasted with feeling and 
    instinct."

"Power of the mind" we may disregard for what is not power of 
mind? (I'll rather say power of intelligence)  REASON is the arch-
objective feature and FEELING the arch-subjective ditto. So the 
power/ability to distinguish between the two looks very much how 
the said dictionary defines "intellect". 

I know that other dictionaries defines "intellect" less SOL-like and 
more SOM-like; the ability to think, as MIND for short.  

> Bo:
> > ..most people at this discussion are
> > somists in spite of using MOQ terminology
 
> Steve:
> What do you mean by somists? Am I one?

Well, like I say, they talk a lot about Quality, mostly the dynamic 
kind - which sounds like a state of being. They also present the 
(static) intellectual level as dynamic, as some empty vessel that 
was filled by a bad pattern called SOM and under its yoke for 
millenniums, but - now - may be have the MOQ as its top 
content, ignoring the fact that this violates the MOQ. There are 
no "bad" patterns inside any level, it's from the higher level the 
good/bad comes in. Treating the MOQ as an intellectual pattern 
that remains comfortably within intellect makes for a somist. 

If you, Steve, are a somist? Not when you ask such relevant 
questions as these, and you show openness regarding the SOL. 
You must have some antenna that picks up quality. I know I 
sound like a madman acting like this - year after year -  but the 
MOQ hit me - in the SOL way - and I can't let it fall back into 
SOM.     

IMO

Bo 






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to