> [Platt]
> My own conclusion is that no administration,
> conservative or liberal, is
> obligated to support dubious science.
>
> [Arlo]
> Aren't we lucky, then, that its always the libs who
> engages in dubious science?
Platt, isn't the point that if Bush and his
administration doesn't want to support this science of
global warming, he has that right, and can voice his
disdain in public if he so wishes. Yet, once he tries
to censor another opinion, then he has crossed a
terrible line. You may keep your faith with Bush,
since Bush and his administration haven't stated their
position on this matter, so your faith is all you have
to go on this issue it seems. Unless you see this
another way.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
