Quoting Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [Platt] > > My own conclusion is that no administration, > > conservative or liberal, is > > obligated to support dubious science. > > > > [Arlo] > > Aren't we lucky, then, that its always the libs who > > engages in dubious science? > > > Platt, isn't the point that if Bush and his > administration doesn't want to support this science of > global warming, he has that right, and can voice his > disdain in public if he so wishes. Yet, once he tries > to censor another opinion, then he has crossed a > terrible line. You may keep your faith with Bush, > since Bush and his administration haven't stated their > position on this matter, so your faith is all you have > to go on this issue it seems. Unless you see this > another way.
Lots more than faith concerned with the global warming issue. There are plenty of qualified naysayers about it. As for censoring, the administration denies any such thing. But as you know, you can't prove a negative to anyone's satisfaction, especially to those who have an irrational rabid hatred of Bush. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
