Hi Chris, you soaid: >Fair enough. The following taken by itself from a general metaphysical view >(my interpretation of the MOQ) :Do you not agree with my general assessment >that people can be predominated with either the social or the intellectual >level (and in some cases the biological)? And do you not agree with my >assessment that to be dominated by one of these patterns makes one view >things fundamentally different?
Steve: That is the whole point of Pirsig using the characters of Lila, Rigel, and Phaedrus. They each represent a level of value patterns and they definitely saw things differently. I would just coment that I don't think we can say which type of pattern dominates a specific person. How can you say that any type of pattern dominates anyone more than inorganic patterns? I do think you can talk about the relative dominance of different types of vale patterns. Rigel was certainly more dominated by social patterns than Phaedrus was. Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
