Chris an Moqtalk Chris said to Spirit of (SA): > What DO you think I am advocating? It is not as if I don't believe in the > MOQ! Could you state for me, as simple as possible what you think I am > advocating that you presuming don't agree with?
Bo: Well put Chris and if it's not the "kiss of death" I'm amazed of your grasp of the MOQ ... its SOL interpretation that is, something that is necessary for it to be effective . Chris went on: > One thing I can repeat though is the undisputable fact that the MOQ is > static (agreed it has the ability to Dynamic Change), and does not provide > the ultimate understanding - it just provides a better understanding. No big thing, but in my opinion the MOQ is neither static nor dynamic, rather the Dynamic/Static Reality itself. Admittedly it has a (static) level-like aspect vis-à-vis intellect because it's out of it, yet once free of intellect's S/O tentacles it's neither. To pick one more nit, the MOQ is THE "goodness understanding", thus a better understanding than the MOQ is hard to imagine, but here we are at the end of our wits. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
