Hello Heather > Chris: >> The Rock is a inorganic pattern from a MOQ >> perspective, and it is matter >> from a SOM perspective - it is perhaps a part of God >> in a world view based >> in the social level, it doesn't really matter, what >> matters is that all of >> these explenations is right, from each level's >> perspective. And all of them >> are in conflict. So the MOQ says.
> Chris: The moq is a philosophy. Thus, the moq is not > just an intellectual value, It may not be, however it has grown from the intellectual level, influenced by DQ of course. >But it is also a > philosophy that states other static patterns are value > too. Therefore, it is the moq, as an intellecutal > philosophy, that is stating a rock is an inorganic > pattern. Is SOM a level in your book? The SOM, or rather the whole distinction between a subject world and an object world and the specific reactions to Quality that that kind of "thinking" produces is indeed a Level. The intellectual level. I suspect what your next question might be, but please, go on. Friendly regards (a direct translation there - English does lack in nuances in some aspects, or maybe my skills in it =) Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
