> Ron: > How does this explain your stance? Quality is morality, morality is > reality > Reality is experience. Your experience in particular. So it is your > opinion > On what is superior.
Platt: My experience has much in common with yours, otherwise we couldn't be conversing. Everyone has opinions. I happen to agree with Pirsig's about the moral superiority of the higher levels over the lower. Ron: But what does that mean exactly? Given how we just defined superiority, Moral, and reality as the same? > > Ron: > That reality is superior to reality? > If, by your own words morality equals reality then your statement is > contradictory and makes little sense. > Or is it reality is superior > To human perception of it. That makes sense. Platt: That makes no sense to me. Please explain. Ron: Reality is superior to the human perception of it. > Ron: > No, I am not denying superiority from my own opinion, > But I realize that it is all that it is, my own. It serves > Great pragmatic purpose and great care must be taken > To develop it. Fine. We agree. > > Ron: > You are doing it now defending your opinion of superiority. > Platt, if you would, define your superiority less what it refers to. > This might be a good start. Platt: I don't see how you can define anything without reference to something else. Ron: Exactly my point about superiority Thanks Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
