> Ron Prev: > > Reality is superior to the human perception of it.
Platt: How can reality be superior to the human perception of it when human experience is reality and when reality includes the superiority of the higher levels over the lower? > Platt: > I don't see how you can define anything without reference to something > else. > > Ron: > Exactly my point about superiority. Ron: Hello Platt, I think I see where we disagree. If I remember from past posts You are of the opinion that what we experience everyday is reality The whole shebang, what we perceive is exactly what is there, nothing More, where I am of the mind that what we perceive is not the whole Picture, not only that, what limited portions we do perceive are Simplified and colored by the society we live in. This difference will set us apart in this discussion and Create some confusion about meaning. This is where I am coming from when I say reality is more moral than the human Perception of it. SA and I recently touched on this issue in the "this event" thread Where I tried to relay this concept. I will respect your opinion If you are set in it. I will not go Into it unless you are interested in doing so. Platt: But, I thought your point was that in reality nothing is superior to anything else. Have I mistaken your view? Ron: In a way. What I mean is that in the perceptible world we live in Everyday superiority applies, value judgments describe our world. The patterns of energy that comprise it are defined by value too. What defines superiority differs by every act of value atoms to thoughts. So it really can't be defined as anything in particular but as a Process. You said so yourself that distinction is relative. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
