Hi folks

Haven't a lot of europeans fairly recently
moved from a corrupt form of command economy
to a corrupt form of free market capitalism?
You can find out what they are thinking
quite easily on line. I think the still poor
have one view and the enriched another
and the en-poored yet another. Not
sure about socialism, could ask the Swedes.

David M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The End of Faith - Spirituality


> [Platt]
> Pirsig would no doubt approve the statement that the "poor are much better 
> off
> under capitalism than socialism . . ." due to better access to Dynamic 
> Quality
> in a free market society. More moral indeed!
>
> [Arlo]
> Are the "poor" better or worse off because of public libraries? Would the
> "poor" be better off if we shut down all the public libraries and 
> converted
> them to Barnes and Nobles?
>
> Let's go back to the fabled pre-socialist era of the early 20th century. 
> Give
> me some measures you would use to show me how the "poor" were better off 
> then?
> Better income? Better health care? Better education? Contrast the workers 
> in
> the Pullman camps to the factory workers at GM today. Tell me in what ways 
> the
> Pullman laborers were "better off"?
>
> Since we favor the "free market", do you think people would be better off 
> with
> a privatized police force than a socialized one? Why? Why is a socialized
> police force better than a private one?
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to