Greetings Abey. Hi Jorge In the avalanche of non-MOQ related posts I haven't noticed your arrival, but yours of 10 March woke me up. I believe this is you speaking to Jorge, there are so many ways of editing posts.
Abey: > You seem to be missing the point of ZMM. Somewhere at the beginning > RP talks about the the underlying form of the underlying form of > science. MOQ is a study of the structure on which science/western > thought is built. Whatever advances in science that you talk about are > more in the nature of the tree of science developing new branches and > consequently those fruits. Say again, there arrive new participants and I (as the self- appointed arbiter) have great expectations but so few seem to understand the very roots of the MOQ. Your saying that the MOQ is a study of the structure ...etc. hopefully means that it takes a step out of SOM and on to a higher metaphysical plane: the Dynamic/Static one. > MOQ attacks the very root of the tree of science and its main > objective is to try and free it from being a prisoner to the > psuedo-mystical immersion in a blind belief in empirical verities. > Thats to put it badly. Exactly, but it only attacks science in its SOM capacity and leaves the residual S/O divide as its own intellectual level (the SOL interpretation) Something that much of LILA supports or advocates, yet, when asked to directly define the said level as the S/O distinction Pirsig hesitated and that leaves the MOQ in limbo. IMO Bo PS I'm writing on a response to Jorge's. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
