Chris and whoever it may concern. On 11 March Chris cited my: (for Ron)
> > > > The 5th level will haunt me forever it seems. Do you know Godel's > > > > Theorem? No system can be totally closed, they all require a "God's > > > > eye" view from the outside, and the meta-level of the MOQ is > > > > needed to see the Quality Universe. SA previously: > > > Since Bo declares he's the "True Metaphysican", and his 5th level > > > with all the other mumbo jumbo is his interpretation, now Bo is > > > declaring that with his interpretation one can have "God's eye view". > > > Yet, as quoted, Bo declares he's the only one that sees this way, so, > > > Bo is declaring that he is the only one with "God's eye view". And > > > the saga continues... Chris: > > This is quite funny. I suppose a debate degenerates to this kind of name > > calling-and shouting the same things over and over if it has been going > > on for to long. can be fun ^__^ SA: > I'm not "name calling". I'm quoting Bo, and discussing his logic. I > can see how his assertions can be disturbing. Or - do I ignore his > assertions and not quote them? Is that what you suggest? Don't worry about SA, I guess he understands what a "God's eye view" means in a philosophical context, but found it too tempting to present me as suffering from some Messiah delusion. The important thing is that the SOL interpretation (of the MOQ) gives it its intended explanatory power, this interpretation seems to have gathered momentum after your arrival. I'm looking forward to your post on ...things. Look out for mine on the Sophists. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
