> [Krimel] > What good is a system of morals based on levels when hierarchy of levels > provides no guidance as to which level has moral priority? I thought that > was your point over and over with the Doctor and the Germ. But if it is > immoral for the higher level society to kill the lower level trees then > what > does the MoQ have to tell us about morality? >
Krim By the way I think Pirsig suggests we can kill germs to save people not just kill germs for sport, fun or a laugh. Germs have a value but one lower than people. Perhaps immoral to kill all germs as this would then make higher levels impossible as they depend on germs in the gut, etc. Sure you realise this point. Now eat up your good germs. DM Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
