[Krimel]
> And I would simply say, "The universe doesn't "know" anything and is
> a-moral."

[Platt]
I would be interested to know if you find anything false or objectionable 
in the following passages from Pirsig in Chapter 22 of Lila:

[Krimel]
Just as consciousness emerges from biological system so to can morality. It
does not need to be built into the framework of the universe itself to
command our attention. Morality in a larger sense is derived from biology
and evolution to support human life. Certain aspects of morality do appear
to be universal among human which implies to me a biological root. For
example "tit for tat" or "do unto others as they do unto you."

A fairly long list of such universal moral concerns might be constructed but
must be considered in terms of the functions served. The specific
expressions of morality are what get people in trouble in cross cultural
situations as it is easy for us to confuse the form in which morality is
express with the function it serves. A glaring example would be how
different cultures express reverence for the dead. In some cultures the dead
are buried in others they may be eaten. But societies are expressing respect
for the dead but my find the specific practices mutually disgusting.

Morality at the level of atoms at least a Pirsig describes it has nothing
whatever to do with morality as social custom. Morality in terms of cultural
practice is relative to the culture that upholds it. It serves the needs of
the people that practice it. It expresses their shared values.

Such morality does not need to be a property of TiTs or the universe as a
whole. But this does not deny that morals are vital to human culture.
Furthermore morality and the affect of social situations has a rich
literature that shows both within and across culture how individual behavior
is influenced by the presence or absence of other.

The specific expressions of morality across cultures do have an arbitary
character to them. Monogamy and polygamy for example have both been widely
used by different cultures. They both are effective ways to raise a healthy
new generation but which technique a society employs depends on history and
circumstance. While history and circumstance vary from people to people the
functional need to rear children does not.

So while I agree that the universe is purposeless I deny that we are. I
would also deny that science in anyway claims that individuals are isolated
in the way Pirsig describes and I think he may be confusing the arbitrary
expressions of morality with the functions served.


----------------------------------------------------------------

"From the perspective of a subject-object science, the world is a 
completely purposeless, valueless place. There is no point in anything. 
Nothing is right and nothing is wrong. Everything just functions, like 
machinery. There is nothing morally wrong with being lazy, nothing morally 
wrong with lying, with theft, with suicide, with murder, with genocide. 
There is nothing morally wrong because there are no morals, just 
functions."

"Everyone seemed to be guided by an "objective," "scientific" view of life 
that told each person that his essential self is his evolved material body. 
Ideas and societies are a component of brains, not the other way around. No 
two brains can merge physically, and therefore no two people can ever 
really communicate except in the mode of ship's radio operators sending 
messages back and forth in the night. A scientific, intellectual culture 
had become a culture of millions of isolated people living and dying in 
little cells of psychic solitary confinement, unable to talk to one 
another, really, and unable to judge one another because scientifically 
speaking it is impossible to do so. Each individual in his cell of 
isolation was told that no matter how hard he tried, no matter how hard he 
worked, his whole life is that of an animal that lives and thinks like any 
other animal. He could invent moral goals for himself, but they are just 
artificial inventions. Scientifically speaking he has no goals."



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to