[Krimel] > What good is a system of morals based on levels when the hierarchy of > levels provides no guidance as to which level has moral priority?
[Craig] The hierarchy of levels is the moral priority (see "Lila"). [Krimel] I have already rephrased this question three times. In the cases of Easter Island and Haiti societies destroyed themselves by deforesting the respective islands. Social values dominated biological one. The MoQ value hierarchy would say morality was served. I would suggest that the 'levels' provide no guidance to morality at all and that what is at issue is balance and harmony among conflicting forces regardless of taxonomy or position in the taxonomy. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
