Hi Ian On 15 April:
> [Bo] > That intellect have its origin in society is plain, but just as plain > is it that the next level is a break with its origin. > [Arlo] > Certainly. Although .... > [Ian] It's at that level that intellect recognized the idea of its > break with its origin in the social level, but clearly it is not > really any kind of break, just a recognition .... that it was and is > socially conditioned. Let's agree it's the point where intellect > wishes it wasn't (socially conditioned). Why wouldn't the social level recognize its break with the biological level? Clearly not because there aren't intelligence around, but because no level knows any level context, the 4th. no exception. When the idea that SOM (what became "intellect" in the first MOQ) was a subset of Quality occurred to Phaedrus, the intellectual immune system attacked him and struck him down and the Pirsig who emerged from hospital did not dare to follow the original path. Only from the MOQ do we see that all static level suffer from the illusion of being reality itself, but (as I wrote to Arlo) we also see that this limitation is necessary for the levels to work properly. An intellect aware of its social origin would be a mere social appendix, just what it sounds like Pirsig wants it to be. Admittedly he avoids the term "intellect", but speaks of science and/or knowledge as having forgotten the said origin , because - to him - these are the villainous SOM that has raped the neutral valueless "intellect". OK, I see that you try to meet me halfway, but nothing will do but recognize intellect for what it is, a static level with a limited set of value, the S/O. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
