Found some mistakes, but people will probably read the first one before this revised post. I changed one sentence to read "I don't know", instead of "I don't". It changes the meaning significantly.
> Ron, > > You seem to be overlapping meaning as to what > dynamic is and what static is. Instead of dynamic > and > static, you seem to be stating we could use abstract > and concrete instead. This is similar to what > Krimel > does, except he replaces dynamic with chaos and > static > with order. Why do we need these words to interpret > dynamic and static for us? Is this necessary? I > guess I do this to, though, when I think about it. > I > overlap and use the word undefined for dynamic and > defined for static. I don't know who's correct. Are > static and dynamic such encompassing concepts that > we > pick and choose other words to interpret them? Are > they that removed from intellectual understanding > that > we pick and choose words to analogize static and > dynamic better? I don't know. I seem to be thrown in a > loop at the moment. I'm trying to be critical of my > usual static=defined and dynamic=undefined, > approach, > and this being critical seems to be working and > tearing down walls in my head - I really am knocked for > a > loop at the moment. Is this what your doing with > your > abstract and concrete approach? Are you trying to > interpret dynamic and static in ways that bridge how > you understand these qualities? > > > ?, > SA > > > > > > > > > Joe (It is Joe, also, correct?): > > > > I have difficulty with the word ³abstract² > used > > > for > > > > DQ! > > > > > > SA previously: Yes, I don't agree with this > > detail > > of what Ron > > > said either for if we're talking about abstract > > > thoughts/intellect, well, that's an intellectual > > > pattern. When it comes to labeling dynamic > > quality > > > in any way that is taboo. > > > > Ron: > > > Addition: > > > THIS is why the MoQ is paralyzed, the > > conflagration > > > of Quality with DQ. > > > Thus arresting it's method of explanation via > > > passive/active understanding. > > > > > > SA: This is one event I've learned by being on > this > > forum. I can say another is a more happy > > co-existence > > with technology, which I strived for even before > > participating on this forum, but even more since I > > joined. I accept Quality is not dq and Quality is > > not > > sq - Quality is neither of these solely, but > Quality > > is both of these and it is Quality that is the > > monism. > > Dq and sq are able to work together, integrating, > > and > > from this coming together of sq and dq - > creativity, > > the abyss of Quality. > > I'm wondering why you added this. You > > stated > > above that abstract thought is dynamic quality. > > > > > > Ron; > > I stated that above because I think you > > misunderstood what I mean. > > I'm not saying abstract thought as much as quality > > being expressed > > Abstractly. In other words happiness, the > > experience, is just as > > Real as the seemingly concrete experience of a > > chair. I say that > > Happiness, the experience, is a Dynamic one where > a > > chair is a > > Static or more concrete an experience. We can > argue > > that both experiences > > Have similar attributes but it's the > distinguishing > > of experience which > > DQ/SQ performs in the first split of understanding > > and explanation. > > What I said before, that when we use the word > > quality in a sentence, in it's > > Abstract form the word Dynamic becomes redundant > > because the abstract form > > Of quality is dynamic. But when we term static > with > > quality we get the concrete form of Quality which, > > as is said, is an illusion of perception > > And assumption, but useful in description of > > experience. > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Be a better friend, newshound, and > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > > > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
