Ron,
You seem to be overlapping meaning as to what
dynamic is and what static is. Instead of dynamic and
static, you seem to be stating we could use abstract
and concrete instead. This is similar to what Krimel
does, except he replaces dynamic with chaos and static
with order. Why do we need these words to interpret
dynamic and static for us? Is this necessary? I
guess I do this to, though, when I think about it. I
overlap and use the word undefined for dynamic and
defined for static. I don't now who's correct. Are
static and dynamic such encompassing concepts that we
pick and choose other words to interpret them? Are
they that removed from intellectual understanding that
we pick and choose words to analogize static and
dynamic better? I don't. I seem to be thrown in a
loop at the moment. I'm trying to be critical of my
usual static=defined and dynamic=undefined, approach,
and this being critical seems to be working and
tearing down walls in head - I really am knocked for a
loop at the moment. Is this what your doing with your
abstract and concrete approach? Are you trying to
interpret dynamic and static in ways that bridge how
you understand these qualities?
?,
SA
> > Joe (It is Joe, also, correct?):
> > > I have difficulty with the word ³abstract² used
> > for
> > > DQ!
> >
> > SA previously: Yes, I don't agree with this
> detail
> of what Ron
> > said either for if we're talking about abstract
> > thoughts/intellect, well, that's an intellectual
> > pattern. When it comes to labeling dynamic
> quality
> > in any way that is taboo.
>
> Ron:
> > Addition:
> > THIS is why the MoQ is paralyzed, the
> conflagration
> > of Quality with DQ.
> > Thus arresting it's method of explanation via
> > passive/active understanding.
>
>
> SA: This is one event I've learned by being on this
> forum. I can say another is a more happy
> co-existence
> with technology, which I strived for even before
> participating on this forum, but even more since I
> joined. I accept Quality is not dq and Quality is
> not
> sq - Quality is neither of these solely, but Quality
> is both of these and it is Quality that is the
> monism.
> Dq and sq are able to work together, integrating,
> and
> from this coming together of sq and dq - creativity,
> the abyss of Quality.
> I'm wondering why you added this. You
> stated
> above that abstract thought is dynamic quality.
>
>
> Ron;
> I stated that above because I think you
> misunderstood what I mean.
> I'm not saying abstract thought as much as quality
> being expressed
> Abstractly. In other words happiness, the
> experience, is just as
> Real as the seemingly concrete experience of a
> chair. I say that
> Happiness, the experience, is a Dynamic one where a
> chair is a
> Static or more concrete an experience. We can argue
> that both experiences
> Have similar attributes but it's the distinguishing
> of experience which
> DQ/SQ performs in the first split of understanding
> and explanation.
> What I said before, that when we use the word
> quality in a sentence, in it's
> Abstract form the word Dynamic becomes redundant
> because the abstract form
> Of quality is dynamic. But when we term static with
> quality we get the concrete form of Quality which,
> as is said, is an illusion of perception
> And assumption, but useful in description of
> experience.
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
