Ron, SA, (Bo) that's where you're being a too hard on Bo, but if Bo isn't coming back to my point, not sure what I can do to help.
Yes the core of any metaphysics is axiomatic, and any choice of direction of ontological splitting, is just that a "deemed" choice. There cannot be any fundamental / defintive statement of why any one choice is better ... other than it works for as much of the experienced world as possible with minimum inconsistency and maximum completeness - of course nothing can be entirely complete AND consistent - so yet more choice about what is "best". Do we really need anyone to tell us these things ? Bo can't because no-one can, no-one should be expected to. The second aspect of debating with Bo whether the Intellectual (and social layers) are just a version of objectivism / SOMism is really just an evolving linguistic problem - ie what's in a name historically ... where I've parted company with Bo before ... but not really a big deal from my perspective. Ian On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ron: > > So if you can explain to me, basically, how it > > provides greater > > explanatory > > Power than objectivism then I'm all ears. > > SA: I've tried this route, and all Bo will say is the > dq/sq split is better, oh, and that it's an axiom. So > is choo-choo-cha-goo an axiom. Bo's trying to run > from thinking, for that's the, '...very SOM...' he > says, '...the moq has overcome.' > > > SA > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
