Ron

On 12 May you wrote:

> What I am missing is a coherent argument from you about SOL. Which you
> seem unable to produce. So far you base it all on Some sort of
> bastardized Frankenstein monster version of Pirsigs MoQ supporting SOM
> and solving by redefining, which dresses to Impress but fails on the
> dance floor. It supplies nothing new. So humor me Bodivar, just this
> last time. Lets go over this one more time, Your central contention is
> that S/O distinction arises out of experience. That the intellectual
> level is a logical philosophy Based on this experience through "logical
> channels". You state that "logic" is pre-existent to intellect. Animals
> can perform it. Logic is inherent in nature. 

It's a short way from Capitol to the .??...cliffs as the Romans said, 
what have I done to deserve this? The SOL is now so firmly 
underpinned that the only alternatives are ignore me (Matt) or just 
shout incoherent "no no" without any MOQ backing or 
understanding. I doubt if you are capable of concentrating  long 
enough to listen through the full version, but look to this for Ian.  

                                 --------------

Do you agree that the intellectual level is the fulcrum? If Pirsig 
had treated it as SOM - not as if the villainous cuckoo "science" 
had laid its S/O egg in its nest,  then the SOL would have been 
the one and only interpretation? Now, in the Paul Turner letter 
Pirsig comes one hair's breadth from admitting that the 4th. level 
is SOM.   

    I think the same happens to the term, "intellectual," when 
    one extends it much before the Ancient Greeks.*  

".. the same" is the absurdity of making the social level disappear 
into molecules, cells and atoms, and "the ancient Greeks" is 
SOM in moqtalk. So here we have it from Pirsig for those who 
think  I commit a "lèse majesty".  

                              ------------------------

See Ron, Pirsig comes as close as his pride permits to affirming 
the SOL, what more do you need?  

> Since S/O distinction arises out of experience This duality must exist
> in some form in reality. 

"... out of experience"???  SOM is "out of society". As said to Ian 
Pirsig presents science as a S/O cuckoo that has taken over the 
intellectual level.This is not right: science is an intellectual pattern 
because the S/O distinction is intellects VALUE. This is the only 
way to cut the Gordian Knot that LILA tied the MOQ into and for it 
to wield its enormous power.   

Bo





Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to