Hi Craig, It is not something to argue about that is for sure!
Joe On 5/15/08 1:52 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Joe] >> In the history of thought a theory of knowledge precedes metaphysics. > > [DM] >> Does not every theory of knowledge assume a metaphysics >> whereby it can make any judgements? > > Here is the dilemma: On the one hand, nothing is real unless > it can be known/experienced. So theory of knowledge precedes metaphysics. > But on the other hand, we cannot know/experience anything that we don't know > is possibly real. So metaphysics must precede a theory of knowledge. > Might it be that our theory of knowledge & our metaphysics must emerge > together? > Craig > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
