On Friday 9 May 1:00 PM SA writes to Bo: <snip>
SA: Bo, this is what I mean. Where up above do you say what dq/sq split is, other than an axiom? This is the same as saying lapodocoldieameida is reality. I'm not trying to be harsh, but if you can't say what dq/sq split is, then lapodocoldieameida might be better instead. Don't you think? Is your reality complete mu, complete denial of everything, such as Jainism? If these comments are true, then your reality is truly personal, thus, something I wouldn't know about only you would. Is that your intent? Hi SA, Bo and all, I realize this is addressed to Bo, but I want to add my two cents to ³a statement accepted as true without proof or argument². IMO Dq/sq is a simple division. DQ is undefined and SQ is defined reality. Put that statement into history. DQ in metaphysics is the Conscious only experience of an individual. It differs from the subjective experience of SOM, which proposes an abstracted essence given intentional existence in a mind. DQ is a real, undefined, conscious experience of existence. SQ can be described as a Conscious/Mechanical experience. The Conscious element in SQ experience is embodied in ³analogy², metaphor, or gesture. The Mechanical element is defined mathematically. Another way of looking at it, DQ is an order in existence and is a law unto itself. SQ is a Manifestation in existence, requiring three aspects for intelligibility, what it is, what it isn¹t, what supports it (DQ). Evolution is an acknowledgement of the duality DQ/SQ. Metaphysics is DQ/SQ. This is how I understand how Bo envisions a MOQ meta-level of metaphysics ³an axiom accepted as true without proof or argument². Joe On 5/9/08 1:00 PM, "Heather Perella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SA: Bo, this is what I mean. Where up above do you > say what dq/sq split is, other than an axiom? This is > the same as saying lapodocoldieameida is reality. I'm > not trying to be harsh, but if you can't say what > dq/sq split is, then lapodocoldieameida might be > better instead. Don't you think? Is your reality > complete mu, complete denial of everything, such as > Jainism? If these comments are true, then your > reality is truly personal, thus, something I wouldn't > know about only you would. Is that your intent? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
