Quoting Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > You certainly have shown you don't understand the MOQ. > > [Arlo] > Maybe. What does everyone else think? Is "Quality" a "Quali-god" with > volition and intent? > > [Platt] > Quote from Pirsig: " Neither is there a quarrel between the > Metaphysics of Quality and the "teleological" theories which insist > that life has some > purpose." > > Now what is there about these words you don't understand? > > [Arlo had said about these telelogical theories] > So, are all these correct? That would mean "purpose" is completely > relative doesn't it? > > [Arlo now] > Which of these words don't you understand? Are all these teleological > theories correct? Is purpose relative? > > And here is something else to think about. If, as you say, > Quali-god's recent destruction of Burma was planned and carried out > as part of some larger plan, what does that say about free will? Were > those people "expendable" in the eyes of Quali-god? And, if Quali-god > orders and plans the cosmos as you suggest, was the meeting of your > wife part of that plan? Were you just a unwilling piece of > Quali-god's plan? Is everything that happened to you part of > Quali-god's plan, that it enacts with volition and intent? Or does > Quali-god only order and willfully manipulate the cosmos apart from "man"?
Again, your imagination working overtime. The idea of a Quali-god is yours and yours alone. If you believe in fairies, so be it. It takes all kinds. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
