> > SA previously: This would
> > keep the current undertakings intact, compassion
> would not leave them. Compassion would have taken
on a
> much larger role though, not just a Tibetan role,
but a
> > more universal role of compassion. This would
> seem to be attuned to the Bodhisattva way in the
first
> place.
> KHA: I dont think the choice being framed is that of
> rejecting compassion in the form of the Dalai Lama
or not... framed
> in his proposal is to let us decide if there is a
> 15th Dalai Lama, but that does not mean the
> Bodhisattva of Compassion wont
> manifest elsewhere in another form. Thats not our
> choice to make.
SA: Or is it the people's choice? If the people vote
to have a 15th Dali Lama, then aren't they voting to
have the Bodhisattva of Compassion back in the form of
the Dali Lama? Or, are you saying the people could
vote for the continuance of the Dali Lama, but the
Bodhisattva of Compassion reserves the choice to be
reincarnated as the Dali Lama by this Bodhisattvas own
choosing? Wouldn't this also be a change? One that
hasn't happened in the each of the last 14 Dali Lama's
(thus including this one)?
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
