Ron:
Essentialism, to me seems to be a cosmogony based on 
Cosmological dualism. It uses formal logical deductive 
Inference As it's proof creating A metaphysical cosmology.
This ancient field of study seeks to draw intuitive conclusions about
the nature of the universe, man, god and/or their relationships based on
the extension of some set of presumed facts.
metaphysical cosmology has also been observed as the placing of man in
the universe in relationship to all other entities.
This is demonstrated by the observation made by Marcus 
Aurelius of a man's place in that relationship: 
" "He who does not know what the world is does not 
know where he is, and he who does not know for what 
purpose the world exists, does not know who he is, 
nor what the world is." This is the purpose of the 
ancient metaphysical cosmology and tends toward the 
religious domain of which Pirsig strays from.

Robert Pirsigs MoQ, follows the school of continental
Philosophy which questions whether the ultimate reason 
or source for the universe to exist can be answered
normatively . Pirsigs MoQ is mainly ontological
in nature concerned chiefly with physical cosmology
and how it is viewed. Adopting the concept of 
universals as being "concepts," and therefore of 
the mind, and therefore controllable by free will. 
Thus, we get the analysis of Aurelius' that the 
nature of the universe is not from "intuition," 
but from a free-will, conceptual understanding 
of the nature of the universe.

I think this is why you find fault with Pirsig.
Everything you view as central, he dismisses as an
Intellectual pattern. 

Pirsig is of the Physical cosmology school of thought
Whereas you are from the metaphysical cosmology school.
Therefore you really can't compare the two views
As having more metaphysical foundation than the other.
It's strictly a matter of opinion in this regard.
The basis of Your accusations that MoQ does not fulfill the
Requirements of a true metaphysics is academically
Unfounded.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to