> Nothingness does not exist, although it is what separates the
> atoms, planets, and galaxies in space.

SA:
Does anybody ever get these?  Just curious. 

[Krimel]
Sure. It is a good example of the flawed premises upon which Ham bases
his
"philosophy". The space between things is not "nothing" it "is" the
space
between things. It is extended and temporal. Ham's equates this with
some
kind of imaginary metaphysical nothingness. It is a serious flaw that he
refuses to address.

Here's another:

"Only because the subjective mind cannot conceive of an "uncreated"
source. 
And here's where intuitive logic can extend empirical knowledge.  My
cosmogeny is based on the absolute unity of an uncreated Essence which,
on
analysis, turns out to be the antithesis of Nothingness."

Ham has never shown a serious understanding of the Big Bang. He thinks
it is
like a big fire cracker or something equally absurd. But in physics it
is
the moment of the uncreated source. Even moment since it can be
accounted
for but before it there was Ham's metaphysical nothing. No time, no
space,
nothing. Ham rejects the physicists account because it does not carry
with
it any notion of purpose or destiny or theology. This goes against his
"intuition". For Ham this "intuition" is supreme. It rests neither on
empiricism nor rationalism and requires neither. It is a "warm fuzzy" to
which all else is subservient.

Ron:
There was a broadcast on the history channel about the history of
cosmology
>From Aristotle to the most recent theories of big bang hyper expansion.
Great program. Good to have your input once more.








Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to