My point precusely Arlo. Ian On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Ian] > because "why is there something rather than nothing ?" is still the > first-cause question. > > [Arlo] > Not every question has an answer. Apart from that, "why" presumes a > "reason". It very well may be that there is no "why" at all. And even if we > suppose there is, its something we can never know, either way. > > [Ian] > There is this intangible / ineffable hole where physics meets metaphysics, > even a quality metaphysics. > > [Arlo] > A "hole" that is impossible to fill. A central "mu" of which all "physics" > or "metaphysics" or "art" or anything else can offer is an analogy. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
