Arlo said to Marsha:
What I was trying to show is that "conformity" is not a feature of any one 
level, it is a feature of them all. Those who say "the social level is 
conformity, the intellectual level is freedom" are simply wrong. As I said, the 
thrust of ZMM was about the conformity of western intellectual patterns. Both 
the social level and the intellectual level afford the "individual" with 
certain freedoms, and both bring with it a force of conformity.

dmb says:
Exactly. Both levels have static patterns with which we must more or less 
conform. Intellectuals can get excluded from the church of reason just as the 
social level Giant has its own protective immune system. In either case, it 
becomes a problem when the patterns are too static, too rigid but both also 
need stability. Both offer freedom from the constraints of the level below it 
and both of them accomplish this through the preserving power of static 
patterns. Growth and stability are features of all static patterns, its just 
that the higher levels have a greater capacity to change and grow, have 
increasingly open structures.

Of course, a severe failure to conform at the social level will land you in 
jail or otherwise wreck your life and such a failure to conform at the 
intellectual level will land you in the looney bin or maybe just put you in a 
category called "stupid", but either way there is a price to pay. Just ask Ayn 
Rand. 



_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger2_072008
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to