OK Chris ... I'd like to do that ... discuss the substantive stuff you
wrote ... so ...

My summary, yesterday, was the story so far as I had read it so far -
where we (the wider group) had agreement / differences - again not
asserting my position (except where I said I was, in asides).

I asked what you had said that I had missed ?
I asked you to relate your "knowledge for knowledge sake" point to that ?

I'm wasn't asking you to repeat - just summarise / point to the
specifics - guide me to your point(s). I'm guessing that quoted text
block in the attached mail is it ? Right ?

OK I'll be back.
Regards
Ian

On 7/15/08, Christoffer Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > > - First I put it to you that the nature of the intellectual level is >
> that of
> > > > the "Quest for knowledge for knowledge's sake alone"
> > > >
> > > > - Then I say that Social Level Values should be subordinated to >
> Intellectual
> > > > ones.
> > > >
> > > > - But if Intellectual Values is the movements towards better >
> understanding,
> > > > then I have to draw the conclusion that social structures should be >
> modelled
> > > > into serving that as much as possible.
> > > >
> > > > - Looking at this I notice that "freedom" and concepts like that more
> > and
> > > > more looks like social value patterns - they seem to be instruments >
> which
> > > > the intellectual level have planted in the social level to help
> itself.
> > > >
> > > > - Then It comes to me, quite naturally, that if social structures are
> > to be
> > > > remodelled to serve the intellectual level better (and thus evolution)
> > well
> > > > then the social value pattern that is the _concept of "freedom"_ may >
> have to
> > > > be looked over as well.
> > > >
> > > > The problem occurs when I propose that the freedom that is free market
> > > > enterprises may have to be restricted in order to serve the >
> intellectual
> > > > level (as they are clearly social level patterns) I seem to magically
> > turn
> > > > into Stalin in peoples heads, and the ideological stand-off begins.
> > >
> >
>
> Let's skip the stand-of and discuss the things I wrote then?
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to